Executive Summary
Informations | |||
---|---|---|---|
Name | CVE-2024-27005 | First vendor Publication | 2024-05-01 |
Vendor | Cve | Last vendor Modification | 2024-11-21 |
Security-Database Scoring CVSS v3
Cvss vector : N/A | |||
---|---|---|---|
Overall CVSS Score | NA | ||
Base Score | NA | Environmental Score | NA |
impact SubScore | NA | Temporal Score | NA |
Exploitabality Sub Score | NA | ||
Calculate full CVSS 3.0 Vectors scores |
Security-Database Scoring CVSS v2
Cvss vector : | |||
---|---|---|---|
Cvss Base Score | N/A | Attack Range | N/A |
Cvss Impact Score | N/A | Attack Complexity | N/A |
Cvss Expoit Score | N/A | Authentication | N/A |
Calculate full CVSS 2.0 Vectors scores |
Detail
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: interconnect: Don't access req_list while it's being manipulated The icc_lock mutex was split into separate icc_lock and icc_bw_lock mutexes in [1] to avoid lockdep splats. However, this didn't adequately protect access to icc_node::req_list. The icc_set_bw() function will eventually iterate over req_list while only holding icc_bw_lock, but req_list can be modified while only holding icc_lock. This causes races between icc_set_bw(), of_icc_get(), and icc_put(). Example A: CPU0 CPU1 Example B: CPU0 CPU1 Fix this by ensuring icc_bw_lock is always held before manipulating icc_node::req_list. The additional places icc_bw_lock is held don't perform any memory allocations, so we should still be safe from the original lockdep splats that motivated the separate locks. [1] commit af42269c3523 ("interconnect: Fix locking for runpm vs reclaim") |
Original Source
Url : http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2024-27005 |
Sources (Detail)
Alert History
Date | Informations |
---|---|
2024-11-25 09:25:53 |
|
2024-11-05 21:27:57 |
|
2024-05-13 13:27:29 |
|
2024-05-03 09:27:31 |
|
2024-05-02 02:47:12 |
|
2024-05-02 02:47:06 |
|
2024-05-01 17:27:27 |
|
2024-05-01 13:27:28 |
|