Executive Summary

Informations
Name CVE-2024-50082 First vendor Publication 2024-10-29
Vendor Cve Last vendor Modification 2024-11-08

Security-Database Scoring CVSS v3

Cvss vector : CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Overall CVSS Score 4.7
Base Score 4.7 Environmental Score 4.7
impact SubScore 3.6 Temporal Score 4.7
Exploitabality Sub Score 1
 
Attack Vector Local Attack Complexity High
Privileges Required Low User Interaction None
Scope Unchanged Confidentiality Impact None
Integrity Impact None Availability Impact High
Calculate full CVSS 3.0 Vectors scores

Security-Database Scoring CVSS v2

Cvss vector :
Cvss Base Score N/A Attack Range N/A
Cvss Impact Score N/A Attack Complexity N/A
Cvss Expoit Score N/A Authentication N/A
Calculate full CVSS 2.0 Vectors scores

Detail

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

blk-rq-qos: fix crash on rq_qos_wait vs. rq_qos_wake_function race

We're seeing crashes from rq_qos_wake_function that look like this:

BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffafe180a40084
#PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode
#PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page
PGD 100000067 P4D 100000067 PUD 10027c067 PMD 10115d067 PTE 0
Oops: Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
CPU: 17 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/17 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc3-00013-geca631b8fe80 #11
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1d/0x40
Code: 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 f3 0f 1e fa 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 54 9c 41 5c fa 65 ff 05 62 97 30 4c 31 c0 ba 01 00 00 00 0f b1 17 75 0a 4c 89 e0 41 5c c3 cc cc cc cc 89 c6 e8 2c 0b 00
RSP: 0018:ffffafe180580ca0 EFLAGS: 00010046
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffafe180a3f7a8 RCX: 0000000000000011
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000003 RDI: ffffafe180a40084
RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00000000001e7240 R09: 0000000000000011
R10: 0000000000000028 R11: 0000000000000888 R12: 0000000000000002
R13: ffffafe180a40084 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000003
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9aaf1f280000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: ffffafe180a40084 CR3: 000000010e428002 CR4: 0000000000770ef0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
PKRU: 55555554
Call Trace:

try_to_wake_up+0x5a/0x6a0
rq_qos_wake_function+0x71/0x80
__wake_up_common+0x75/0xa0
__wake_up+0x36/0x60
scale_up.part.0+0x50/0x110
wb_timer_fn+0x227/0x450
...

So rq_qos_wake_function() calls wake_up_process(data->task), which calls try_to_wake_up(), which faults in raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock).

p comes from data->task, and data comes from the waitqueue entry, which is stored on the waiter's stack in rq_qos_wait(). Analyzing the core dump with drgn, I found that the waiter had already woken up and moved on to a completely unrelated code path, clobbering what was previously data->task. Meanwhile, the waker was passing the clobbered garbage in data->task to wake_up_process(), leading to the crash.

What's happening is that in between rq_qos_wake_function() deleting the waitqueue entry and calling wake_up_process(), rq_qos_wait() is finding that it already got a token and returning. The race looks like this:

rq_qos_wait() rq_qos_wake_function() ============================================================== prepare_to_wait_exclusive()
data->got_token = true;
list_del_init(&curr->entry); if (data.got_token)
break; finish_wait(&rqw->wait, &data.wq);
^- returns immediately because
list_empty_careful(&wq_entry->entry)
is true ... return, go do something else ...
wake_up_process(data->task)
(NO LONGER VALID!)-^

Normally, finish_wait() is supposed to synchronize against the waker. But, as noted above, it is returning immediately because the waitqueue entry has already been removed from the waitqueue.

The bug is that rq_qos_wake_function() is accessing the waitqueue entry AFTER deleting it. Note that autoremove_wake_function() wakes the waiter and THEN deletes the waitqueue entry, which is the proper order.

Fix it by swapping the order. We also need to use list_del_init_careful() to match the list_empty_careful() in finish_wait().

Original Source

Url : http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2024-50082

CPE : Common Platform Enumeration

TypeDescriptionCount
Application 8
Os 3639

Sources (Detail)

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/04f283fc16c8d5db641b6bffd2d8310aa7eccebc
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3bc6d0f8b70a9101456cf02ab99acb75254e1852
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/455a469758e57a6fe070e3e342db12e4a629e0eb
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4c5b123ab289767afe940389dbb963c5c05e594e
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b5e900a3612b69423a0e1b0ab67841a1fb4af80f
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d04b72c9ef2b0689bfc1057d21c4aeed087c329f
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e972b08b91ef48488bae9789f03cfedb148667fb
Source Url

Alert History

If you want to see full details history, please login or register.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Date Informations
2024-11-23 03:04:38
  • Multiple Updates
2024-11-22 03:02:46
  • Multiple Updates
2024-11-20 03:01:04
  • Multiple Updates
2024-11-13 21:21:25
  • Multiple Updates
2024-11-09 00:28:02
  • Multiple Updates
2024-11-08 21:27:49
  • Multiple Updates
2024-10-30 17:27:40
  • Multiple Updates
2024-10-30 02:56:01
  • Multiple Updates
2024-10-30 02:55:25
  • Multiple Updates
2024-10-29 17:27:31
  • Multiple Updates
2024-10-29 09:27:31
  • First insertion