Executive Summary
| Informations | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Name | CVE-2024-50142 | First vendor Publication | 2024-11-07 |
| Vendor | Cve | Last vendor Modification | 2024-11-22 |
Security-Database Scoring CVSS v3
| Cvss vector : CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall CVSS Score | 5.5 | ||
| Base Score | 5.5 | Environmental Score | 5.5 |
| impact SubScore | 3.6 | Temporal Score | 5.5 |
| Exploitabality Sub Score | 1.8 | ||
| Attack Vector | Local | Attack Complexity | Low |
| Privileges Required | Low | User Interaction | None |
| Scope | Unchanged | Confidentiality Impact | None |
| Integrity Impact | None | Availability Impact | High |
| Calculate full CVSS 3.0 Vectors scores | |||
Security-Database Scoring CVSS v2
| Cvss vector : | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cvss Base Score | N/A | Attack Range | N/A |
| Cvss Impact Score | N/A | Attack Complexity | N/A |
| Cvss Expoit Score | N/A | Authentication | N/A |
| Calculate full CVSS 2.0 Vectors scores | |||
Detail
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfrm: validate new SA's prefixlen using SA family when sel.family is unset This expands the validation introduced in commit 07bf7908950a ("xfrm: Validate address prefix lengths in the xfrm selector.") syzbot created an SA with Because of the AF_UNSPEC selector, verify_newsa_info doesn't put limits on prefixlen_{s,d}. But then copy_from_user_state sets x->sel.family to usersa.family (AF_INET). Do the same conversion in verify_newsa_info before validating prefixlen_{s,d}, since that's how prefixlen is going to be used later on. |
Original Source
| Url : http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2024-50142 |
CPE : Common Platform Enumeration
Sources (Detail)
Alert History
| Date | Informations |
|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 21:22:06 |
|
| 2024-11-08 21:27:29 |
|
| 2024-11-07 13:27:34 |
|
